Posts tagged USGA

ti4w

Why ‘Tee It Forward’ and 12-Hole Rounds Won’t Work

2

There have been a lot of ideas tossed around on how the governing bodies of golf in the United States can make golf more enjoyable for the average player while making the game more attractive to younger players.

The obvious answer has been to speed up the pace of play. No one wants to sit around and wait to hit shot after shot, wasting upwards of 4½ hours on a course when the actual play of the round takes maybe three hours. Speeding up the pace of play is all fine and good, but how do we go about doing that?

Two ideas that have risen to the forefront of the argument, one brought about by Jack Nicklaus and the other by Barney Adams, the founder of Adams Golf.

In Jack’s case, he believes the best way for golf to appeal to younger players as well as speed up the game for the average hacker would be to shorten golf courses to a more do-able 12-hole track.

As for Mr. Adams, his idea has gained a little more traction than the Golden Bear’s. Adams has become the spokesman for “Tee It Forward,” a new initiative whose goal “is to help golfers have more fun on the course and enhance their overall performance by playing from a set of tees best suited to their abilities.”

For Tee It Forward, PlayGolfAmerica.com has adopted the idea to try and make the game less daunting for average golfers. The PGA of America and USGA have given their support and hope that golf facilities nationwide will incorporate the initiative from July 5-17 on a trial basis.

As stated above, the Tee It Forward plan employs exactly what the name implies, if you play the back tees, then move up to the middle tees and so on. They even supplied a chart based on driving distance that tells you what yardage you should be playing from.

While both of these suggestions are a step in the right direction; meaning they’re better than simply saying, “pick up the pace”; neither one of them will hold any water when it comes to the majority of golfers across the country or even kids just learning the game.

The reason is simple on the surface, but more complex as you dig deeper into it: everyday players want to measure themselves up against the professionals.

On the topic of Mr. Nicklaus’ idea about a 12-hole course, a couple of problems arise. First of all, most, if not all golf courses that are worth their weight in Pentas are built in the traditional 18-hole layout. As you all know (being readers of a golf blog, my assumption is that you all golf, or understand the game in some capacity), after playing the front nine of a course, you make the turn and head back out before finishing back near the clubhouse on the 18th hole.

Therein lies the first problem with the 12-hole golf course. If you were to play only 12 holes, you would be stuck out in the middle of the course when you finished. The obvious way around that would be to play something like holes 1-9 and then finish on 16-18, but that would cause quite the logjam for those players who played the full 18 holes. No one likes when someone randomly pulls in front of them on a tee and plays away.

The only way for this to work would be for entire courses to agree to the 12-hole idea. A front six and back six and nothing else.

It’s not practical. For a game with so much tradition, it seems almost impossible to shorten the course.

I remember playing junior golf where they would let us play three holes, five holes or nine depending on our age and I HATED it. I play nine or 18 with my dad every other time I’m out there, why can’t I do it in the league, I would think. And what does it mean when you come back in and say you shot a 15 or 24 or something like that. It has no comparison to anything you can see not only on the professional level, but what your older siblings or parents are doing.

“Dad, I shot a 15. What did you shoot?” … “75.” … “Oh.”

It distances us from the spirit and integrity of the game.

Clearly, the Tee It Forward initiative has the best chance to stick, if only for the fact that it is only asking players to move forward a tee. However, that is exactly what makes this idea doomed to fail as well.

Golfers are a proud bunch. We brag about not only our scores, but how far we hit a 7-iron. Golf is a game of one-upsmanship. We’re told all that matters is you vs. the course, but it really is you vs. your brother, your friend, your dad. Even if your goal is to break 70, 80 or 90, you still feel like you’re cheating if you move up from your normal tee.

Add into the equation that most golfers think they hit the ball 275 or 250 on average, whatever the case may be. More often than not, they’re lying to themselves, which only adds to the problem.

And for every golfer who is willing to swallow his pride and move up a tee box, there’s 10 others who think that this is the way I’ve been playing forever, there’s no point in doing it now.

Even more to that point, what do you think the likelihood is of a middle-aged man who plays from the middle tees moving up to play the same tees as his wife?

Ain’t gonna happen.

For the true golfer, their quest is to beat something or someone, whether it be a score or a guy that has routinely beat you into the ground. Moving up cheapens that challenge in a sense.

“I finally shot a 79 because I played from the white tees instead of the blue.” … “The only reason I beat Tom was because he was playing the course 500 yards longer than me.” … et cetera, et cetera.

In short, golf is a proud man’s game. It’s a game that people are more likely to give up in old age rather than move up to the ladies tees because they can’t score as well from the tees they’re used to playing.

When it comes down to it, Play Golf America and the governing bodies need to stick to something and ride it out. However, with the state of the game as it is and courses closing far more than they are opening, it’s tough to do.

And with the pride that comes with being a golfer, good luck trying to get people to move up a tee.

rog1011

New Rule Brings Common Sense to Tour Events

0

With so much going on the week of the Masters, I decided to hold off on the revision to Rule 33-7 until after the tournament when things died down a bit.

On Thursday morning, before the first competitors teed off to begin the 2011 Masters, golf’s two governing bodies, the USGA and R&A, announced a new interpretation under the Rules of Golf that would penalize players for score card errors detected using new video technology instead of disqualifying them from the tournament.

In 2010, there were more than a few rules controversies, two in particular that led the USGA and R&A’s change to Rule 33-7.

This revision to Decision 33-7/4.5 addresses the situation where a player is not aware he has breached a Rule because of facts that he did not know and could not reasonably have discovered prior to returning his score card. Under this revised decision and at the discretion of the Committee, the player still receives the penalty associated with the breach of the underlying Rule, but is not disqualified.

The timing of the announcement of the rule was crucial. Some believed it was ignorant to announce the rule just before the beginning of the first major of the year, but in fact, it was smart. With the Masters being broadcast on everything except for your microwave, there was a perfect opportunity for a over-zealous fan to call and report a rules violation that could occur on Augusta National’s slippery greens.

Having the revision of the rule in place gave the Masters the opportunity to use the new interpretation should anything have happened, which it didn’t.

The new rule seems to point out two specific rules violations from last year: Padraig Harrington at Abu Dhabi and Camilo Villegas at Kapalua.

For Harrington, this special decision was implemented:

A competitor moves his ball on the putting green with his finger in the act of removing his ball-marker. The competitor sees the ball move slightly forward but is certain that it has returned to the original spot, and he plays the ball as it lies. After the competitor signs and returns his score card, video footage is brought to the attention of the Committee that reveals that the ball did not precisely return to its original spot. When questioned by the Committee, the competitor cites the fact that the position of the logo on the ball appeared to be in exactly the same position as it was when he replaced the ball and this was the reason for him believing that the ball returned to the original spot. As it was reasonable in these circumstances for the player to have no doubt that the ball had returned to the original spot, and because the player could not himself have reasonably discovered otherwise prior to signing and returning his score card, it would be appropriate for the Committee to waive  the disqualification penalty. The two-stroke penalty under Rule 20-3a for playing from a wrong place would, however, be applied to the player’s score at the hole in question.

However, in Camilo’s case, he would still be disqualified because he potentially improved his lie. Although he did so unknowingly, it would be his responsibility to know the rule and as a result, he would still be disqualified.

As a player’s ball is in motion, he moves several loose impediments in the area in which the ball will likely come to rest.  Unaware that this action is a breach of Rule 23-1, the player fails to include the two-stroke penalty in his score for the hole.  As the player was aware of the facts that resulted in his breaching the Rules, he should be disqualified under Rule 6-6d for failing to include the two-stroke penalty under Rule 23-1.

It has long been lobbied for by members of the Tours as well as the golfing press that score card errors that are not realized by the players on the course should be enforced after the round instead of disqualification. The change to the Rules of Golf is a logical next step as video technology becomes more advanced. Now, when a fan witnesses a rules infraction from his or her couch and phones in the breach, a player will only be docked a two-stroke penalty instead of being disqualified from the tournament.

It seems as if the USGA, R&A and PGA Tour are doing their best to integrate themselves into the modern era. Instituting the Furyk Rule earlier this year and now the new decisions affecting Rule 33-7, it seems that common sense is prevailing over out-dated rules, which is a good thing for the players and the governing bodies.

(To see the full revision of the rule, click here.)

bpbl

Bethpage Black to (Possibly) Host The Barclays

1

A recent Associated Press story filed by the great Doug Ferguson suggests that The Barclays, the first event of the ever-popular FedEx Cup Playoffs, could be leaning towards moving their tournament to Bethpage Black.

However, there have been rumors that some of the Tour officials aren’t too keen on the idea? My question is why not?

For my money, the two US Opens held at the Black have been two of the best of the last decade. In 2002, Tiger Woods went wire-to-wire, holding off Sergio Garcia, while in 2009 Lucas Glover claimed his first major championship in a five-day rainfest, holding off New York’s adopted son, Phil Mickelson and a resurgent David Duval.

One thing is clear, though. Bethpage would much rather host another major championship before becoming just another Tour stop, although holding an event like The Barclays could be worse.

Soon after the Glover US Open of ’09 wrapped up, the Black began their campaign for another US Open. Unfortunately for them, all US Opens venues up until 2020 have been announced, with the exception of the 2018 Open.

The chances of Bethpage garnering that prize doesn’t sound very good if you believe new USGA director of rules and competition, and newly minted executive director of the USGA, Mike Davis.

“I’ve only heard rumors about it,” Davis said about a deal with Barclays and the Black. “I do know the Bethpage people have been looking at other events they could do. It’s fair to say that at least what we have named to date (for the U.S. Open), and what we will name in the very near future, won’t be Bethpage.”

So what’s the next best thing if the Black can’t snatch up the USGA major? Try and get the PGA’s, of course.

The next logical step for the Bethpage would be to show off their public golf course, and what better way than to have the best players in the world come through it once a year?

Ferguson reported that a person with inside knowledge, but who would remain anonymous (shocking!), said that the PGA and the Bethpage parks and recreation department are in negotiations, although the PGA wouldn’t comment on them (another shocker). Either way, it looks like it could be a distinct possibility that the tournament could be on Long Island next year.

The Barclays for 2011 is to be played at Plainfield Country Club, but if the Black Lady gets it in 2012, don’t be surprised if there are some PGA of America suits checking out the course for a possible PGA Championship down the road.

rb

USGA Blue Light Special: Ball Rollback

3

A couple weeks ago, the USGA green lit a tournament-style outing for Canadian Tour members to play a golf ball that has been designed as an scaled-back alternative to the hotter, farther flying ball that is on the market today.

Geoff Shackelford did some sneaky and great reporting following the mini tournament, using Facebook to find out who played the ball, or if they knew someone who played it, how they liked it and if they thought it would be a good thing for the USGA to adopt. The USGA made the competitors sign non-disclosure agreements so those who played were not able to discuss what they thought with the media. Shackelford got around it, though and spoke to two players (one under 25, the other over 30) who knew people who played. The responses was pretty interesting. Here are a few I found interesting.

  • The unmarked ball, described by both sources as having a shallow, odd dimple pattern with “a lot of flat surfacing,” typically went about 20 yards shorter with the best hit drives.
  • The ball did not spin much and flew unusually straight, as well as on a lower trajectory according to both sources. The younger Canadian Tour player whose friends also are under-25 types, said his buds described their experience as unenjoyable because the ball did not curve at all and played like a limited flight range ball. One of his peers also said the feel around the greens was “just awful.”
  • My other source, on the other hand, reported distinctly different views. An early 30′s player of accomplishment, called the experience “unreal.” He loved the shotmaking emphasis, the longer irons hit into greens, the overall emphasis on skill despite his misgivings about the straighter flight of the prototype. He also reported that his fellow playing partners were enthusiastic despite some concerns about the ball seemingly wiping away a distance advantage of one longer player in the group while not impacting others as much.
  • The players who enjoyed their experience said their irons flew about one club shorter, which, combined with the distance off the tee lost, meant 2-3 clubs more into greens.He also reported loving shots around the green more and found that he could play all types of shots, both with backspin or of the bump-and-run variety.  “Way better, so fun,” was the feedback.

To tie this whole thing into this weekend’s event at the Deutsche Bank, two of golf greatest icons agree somewhat that the ball should be rolled back.

Arnold Palmer, one of the biggest proponents on scaling back a lot of the technology told Reuters yesterday that the technology, and the golf ball specifically, needs to be scaled back in order to make the golf courses playable.

“Because of technology, the players of today hit it too far,” Palmer said. “That should be one of the major things on our agenda, to slow the golf ball down so that we don’t tilt the scale.

“We have so many great golf courses but, as the players start hitting it so far, they are outdating our golf courses. We need to see if we can’t just keep it in the range that we have known it for so many years.”

The King’s point has not been lost on me. It’s mind-boggling to see the pros going out and playing golf courses that are 7,500 yards. It seems ridiculous, but still the PGA guys go out and shoot 10-under. With a little scaling back of the ball, maybe more of the older courses will be able to be played and put back in major rotations without being completely overhauled.

Arnie’s point was lost on the world’s number 1, either. Asked yesterday about scaling back the ball Tiger said he understands if it would happen.

“It’s just, I can understand them wanting to obviously pull the game back a little bit, because the guys are just becoming more athletic. Here I am 6 foot and I’m considered short. Most of the guys now are 6-3, 6-2, 6-4. Just like every other sport, it’s evolved, become more athletic.”

As Ryan Ballengee points out, “understanding” isn’t exactly the same as Arnie’s full support for rolling back the ball.

“Understand” obviously isn’t “fully endorse,” but Woods typically has come down on the side of regulation where appropriate. He vouched for drug testing though later received controversial, albeit totally legal, therapy. Woods had (has?) been on the top tier of the PGA distance charts, but has since scaled back to a degree.

The USGA said earlier this week that the study has been going on for a couple of years now and that even with this significant amount of testing, there is not intent to change up the ball any point soon. It seems like this testing is being done for some cushioning if the rule were to go into effect. I think the USGA is doing all their research and fact-gathering so that if the rule were to change, they would have a significant amount of information to feed the players and the public when the ball stops flying 300 yards.

Go to Top