Posts tagged USGA
New Rule Brings Common Sense to Tour Events
0
With so much going on the week of the Masters, I decided to hold off on the revision to Rule 33-7 until after the tournament when things died down a bit.
On Thursday morning, before the first competitors teed off to begin the 2011 Masters, golf’s two governing bodies, the USGA and R&A, announced a new interpretation under the Rules of Golf that would penalize players for score card errors detected using new video technology instead of disqualifying them from the tournament.
In 2010, there were more than a few rules controversies, two in particular that led the USGA and R&A’s change to Rule 33-7.
This revision to Decision 33-7/4.5 addresses the situation where a player is not aware he has breached a Rule because of facts that he did not know and could not reasonably have discovered prior to returning his score card. Under this revised decision and at the discretion of the Committee, the player still receives the penalty associated with the breach of the underlying Rule, but is not disqualified.
The timing of the announcement of the rule was crucial. Some believed it was ignorant to announce the rule just before the beginning of the first major of the year, but in fact, it was smart. With the Masters being broadcast on everything except for your microwave, there was a perfect opportunity for a over-zealous fan to call and report a rules violation that could occur on Augusta National’s slippery greens.
Having the revision of the rule in place gave the Masters the opportunity to use the new interpretation should anything have happened, which it didn’t.
The new rule seems to point out two specific rules violations from last year: Padraig Harrington at Abu Dhabi and Camilo Villegas at Kapalua.
For Harrington, this special decision was implemented:
A competitor moves his ball on the putting green with his finger in the act of removing his ball-marker. The competitor sees the ball move slightly forward but is certain that it has returned to the original spot, and he plays the ball as it lies. After the competitor signs and returns his score card, video footage is brought to the attention of the Committee that reveals that the ball did not precisely return to its original spot. When questioned by the Committee, the competitor cites the fact that the position of the logo on the ball appeared to be in exactly the same position as it was when he replaced the ball and this was the reason for him believing that the ball returned to the original spot. As it was reasonable in these circumstances for the player to have no doubt that the ball had returned to the original spot, and because the player could not himself have reasonably discovered otherwise prior to signing and returning his score card, it would be appropriate for the Committee to waive the disqualification penalty. The two-stroke penalty under Rule 20-3a for playing from a wrong place would, however, be applied to the player’s score at the hole in question.
However, in Camilo’s case, he would still be disqualified because he potentially improved his lie. Although he did so unknowingly, it would be his responsibility to know the rule and as a result, he would still be disqualified.
As a player’s ball is in motion, he moves several loose impediments in the area in which the ball will likely come to rest. Unaware that this action is a breach of Rule 23-1, the player fails to include the two-stroke penalty in his score for the hole. As the player was aware of the facts that resulted in his breaching the Rules, he should be disqualified under Rule 6-6d for failing to include the two-stroke penalty under Rule 23-1.
It has long been lobbied for by members of the Tours as well as the golfing press that score card errors that are not realized by the players on the course should be enforced after the round instead of disqualification. The change to the Rules of Golf is a logical next step as video technology becomes more advanced. Now, when a fan witnesses a rules infraction from his or her couch and phones in the breach, a player will only be docked a two-stroke penalty instead of being disqualified from the tournament.
It seems as if the USGA, R&A and PGA Tour are doing their best to integrate themselves into the modern era. Instituting the Furyk Rule earlier this year and now the new decisions affecting Rule 33-7, it seems that common sense is prevailing over out-dated rules, which is a good thing for the players and the governing bodies.
(To see the full revision of the rule, click here.)
USGA Blue Light Special: Ball Rollback
3
A couple weeks ago, the USGA green lit a tournament-style outing for Canadian Tour members to play a golf ball that has been designed as an scaled-back alternative to the hotter, farther flying ball that is on the market today.
Geoff Shackelford did some sneaky and great reporting following the mini tournament, using Facebook to find out who played the ball, or if they knew someone who played it, how they liked it and if they thought it would be a good thing for the USGA to adopt. The USGA made the competitors sign non-disclosure agreements so those who played were not able to discuss what they thought with the media. Shackelford got around it, though and spoke to two players (one under 25, the other over 30) who knew people who played. The responses was pretty interesting. Here are a few I found interesting.
- The unmarked ball, described by both sources as having a shallow, odd dimple pattern with “a lot of flat surfacing,” typically went about 20 yards shorter with the best hit drives.
- The ball did not spin much and flew unusually straight, as well as on a lower trajectory according to both sources. The younger Canadian Tour player whose friends also are under-25 types, said his buds described their experience as unenjoyable because the ball did not curve at all and played like a limited flight range ball. One of his peers also said the feel around the greens was “just awful.”
- My other source, on the other hand, reported distinctly different views. An early 30′s player of accomplishment, called the experience “unreal.” He loved the shotmaking emphasis, the longer irons hit into greens, the overall emphasis on skill despite his misgivings about the straighter flight of the prototype. He also reported that his fellow playing partners were enthusiastic despite some concerns about the ball seemingly wiping away a distance advantage of one longer player in the group while not impacting others as much.
- The players who enjoyed their experience said their irons flew about one club shorter, which, combined with the distance off the tee lost, meant 2-3 clubs more into greens.He also reported loving shots around the green more and found that he could play all types of shots, both with backspin or of the bump-and-run variety. “Way better, so fun,” was the feedback.
To tie this whole thing into this weekend’s event at the Deutsche Bank, two of golf greatest icons agree somewhat that the ball should be rolled back.
Arnold Palmer, one of the biggest proponents on scaling back a lot of the technology told Reuters yesterday that the technology, and the golf ball specifically, needs to be scaled back in order to make the golf courses playable.
“Because of technology, the players of today hit it too far,” Palmer said. “That should be one of the major things on our agenda, to slow the golf ball down so that we don’t tilt the scale.
“We have so many great golf courses but, as the players start hitting it so far, they are outdating our golf courses. We need to see if we can’t just keep it in the range that we have known it for so many years.”
The King’s point has not been lost on me. It’s mind-boggling to see the pros going out and playing golf courses that are 7,500 yards. It seems ridiculous, but still the PGA guys go out and shoot 10-under. With a little scaling back of the ball, maybe more of the older courses will be able to be played and put back in major rotations without being completely overhauled.
Arnie’s point was lost on the world’s number 1, either. Asked yesterday about scaling back the ball Tiger said he understands if it would happen.
“It’s just, I can understand them wanting to obviously pull the game back a little bit, because the guys are just becoming more athletic. Here I am 6 foot and I’m considered short. Most of the guys now are 6-3, 6-2, 6-4. Just like every other sport, it’s evolved, become more athletic.”
As Ryan Ballengee points out, “understanding” isn’t exactly the same as Arnie’s full support for rolling back the ball.
“Understand” obviously isn’t “fully endorse,” but Woods typically has come down on the side of regulation where appropriate. He vouched for drug testing though later received controversial, albeit totally legal, therapy. Woods had (has?) been on the top tier of the PGA distance charts, but has since scaled back to a degree.
The USGA said earlier this week that the study has been going on for a couple of years now and that even with this significant amount of testing, there is not intent to change up the ball any point soon. It seems like this testing is being done for some cushioning if the rule were to go into effect. I think the USGA is doing all their research and fact-gathering so that if the rule were to change, they would have a significant amount of information to feed the players and the public when the ball stops flying 300 yards.



